no frills, just the basics

Unconditional Basic welfare 

The state doesn't have to own every business. At least one state owned company, in each industry is sufficient. Like in Sweden the poor has access to the government blues. Etc.

Is this still capitalism?

. I'm struggling with the terminology here. I'm referring to a combination of programs as a solution, a means of reform.

State owned car, phone, clothes, food, personal products. Etc.

 As a form of welfare.

As a form of providing an Unconditional Basic needs system. 

Unconditional Basic welfare.

Similar to the Swedish system of handing out government owned clothes and similar to Canada's no label products 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Welfare_in_Sweden

____

No name brand for one of everything. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Name_(brand)

____

Anti-Capitalist League in this theoretical scheme, of Unconditional Basic needs program, the state own production doesn't have to profit from the distribution. In fact, the state can buy the basic model at cost, and re-label every product as (BASIC BRAND) and absorb the cost of distribution from there.

In other words, have a post office version of a wall mart that only gave out basic items to the bottom rung nessities for ppl that can't live without.

____

A state run, or state sponsored (no frills) outlet.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Frills_(grocery_store)

Is the any better then sending ppl to rehab farms, rural community centers, camps where they a forced to learn how to cooperate and learn how to socialize, and function in groups?

In theory, there's only so many ways ppl want to live together. 

By choice, by circumstance, or by force.