declaration of the we

OB, are you speaking for yourself or...who's "we"? The whole group here?

Point 1 - 

Rich Carlson yes  I use the I/we interchangeably...

 you'll find that it's a feature not a flaw of my/our work. 

the "specific we" in this case is the group of people in my immediate network, my extended network, and direct sphere of influence, or otherwise the general supporters of my/our work.

 All the while, my/our views my not reflect the entirely of this, fb group, of 26  as of today 11/14/24, (Sic- temporally precise)

I'm speaking from an interpretation of a distillation of consensus over 30 years of the clarification of thought 

If you feel it's necessary that this group, of 26,  move to vote on and declare every position we can place that as an agenda item at the next "irl meeting"

You can learn more about what this (we) and what I/we have done, here.

At the ERN -  https://emergentrealitynetwork.com/index.php/about

Point 2 - 

Rich Carlson second point -

 it's up to you, the audience to chose which we, you, the individual subscribes to. 

In other words inclusive or exclusive behavior rests in actions of every member.

 As an advocate, we chose to focus on inclusion into we before the exclusive from the we.

If you disagree with any postion, then you can chose to exclude your self from the we that disagrees with that position.

Multiple "we" groups can function collectively without agreement, or consensus.

Point 3 - 

Rich Carlson 3rd point -

1. resistence movements occur with or without participation.

2. Participation occurs with or without co-operation.

3. Co-ooperation occurs with or without consensus of action

4. Consensus of action can occur with or without agreement or compromise 

In other words, the resistance occurs with or without us. It's our choice of participation that defines the "affinity group" to which we subscribe.